From about the time I starting playing Crossfire (version 1.9.1) to now, the only versions that have taken more than about a year to be replaced with a newer one were 1.11.0 and, to some degree, 1.70.0.
Since 1.50.0 had massive changes, thus warranting the delay on 1.11.0's successor, would it be safe to assume the next stable release of Crossfire will be 2.0?
Then again, its only been about fifteen months since the 1.70.0 release, so I could be jumping the gun a little bit.
When's the next release coming?
Moderator: Board moderators
-
- Junior member
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:33 pm
- Location: Planet Earth
When's the next release coming?
That SilverNexus guy? You needn't worry about him.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.
-
- Forum Aficionado
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:55 pm
- Location: Minnesota, USA
- Contact:
Releases usually come down to, "Has there been enough changes to warrant a release?"
Followed by, "How long has it been since the last release?"
Rarely does a release happen to fix a major bug or exploit in an earlier release.
As for the 2.0 release, some have said the combat imbalance at high levels should be improved before that happens.
So, if I were to make a guess, the next release will likely be 1.80.0
(If interested, check the history and release schedule for for how long Crossfire was pre 1.0)
Followed by, "How long has it been since the last release?"
Rarely does a release happen to fix a major bug or exploit in an earlier release.
As for the 2.0 release, some have said the combat imbalance at high levels should be improved before that happens.
So, if I were to make a guess, the next release will likely be 1.80.0
(If interested, check the history and release schedule for for how long Crossfire was pre 1.0)
"Put another, more succinct way: don't complain, contribute. It's more satisfying in the long run, and it's more constructive."
Eric Meyer
Eric Meyer
-
- Junior member
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:33 pm
- Location: Planet Earth
Hmm... I see what you mean. 1.0 saw the light of day in 2001.Leaf wrote:(If interested, check the history and release schedule for for how long Crossfire was pre 1.0)
Although there were more frequent incremental releases pre-1.0 (0.9x.x in particular had a lot of releases), there probably haven't been quite enough functional changes to warrant a new release just yet (most of the changes, as far as I've seen, are in arch since 1.70.0, a noticeable portion of which was my work).
I was probably overreacting, anyway. Ah well.
The next version will come when its ready, and that's for the better.
That SilverNexus guy? You needn't worry about him.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.
One reason that those old versions had a lot more releases is that it predated SVN/CVS/other ways to get the latest source at any given time.
So the only way people would get bug fixes or new features was by a release.
With open source access, this is no longer the case - those interested can always get the latest source (and thus bugs & features) at any time.
However, it is true that some distros only bundle up released versions of software, and do not take sourcecode snaps (which is a good thing), so doing periodic releases if enough stuff changes may be waranted.
So the only way people would get bug fixes or new features was by a release.
With open source access, this is no longer the case - those interested can always get the latest source (and thus bugs & features) at any time.
However, it is true that some distros only bundle up released versions of software, and do not take sourcecode snaps (which is a good thing), so doing periodic releases if enough stuff changes may be waranted.
-
- Junior member
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:33 pm
- Location: Planet Earth
This holds true for Linux Mint and Ubuntu, which are the top two Linux distros in use (to the best of my knowledge), and probably holds true for most, if not all, Debian derivatives. Most people (unless they are actively developing something) will opt for a precompiled and preconfigured package over a bleeding-edge subversion repository version they have to manually set up. If they are just playing the game (or using the software, to make even more general a statement), there isn't too much reason to go through the extra hasslemwedel wrote:However, it is true that some distros only bundle up released versions of software, and do not take sourcecode snaps (which is a good thing), so doing periodic releases if enough stuff changes may be waranted.

That SilverNexus guy? You needn't worry about him.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.
-
- Forum Aficionado
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:55 pm
- Location: Minnesota, USA
- Contact:
Crossfire has the infrastructure in place for a PPA at Launchpad to make Crossfire content updates as easy to install as anything else pre-packaged, but it's not in active use right now.
https://launchpad.net/~crossfire/+archive/ppa
https://launchpad.net/~crossfire/+archive/ppa
"Put another, more succinct way: don't complain, contribute. It's more satisfying in the long run, and it's more constructive."
Eric Meyer
Eric Meyer
-
- Junior member
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:33 pm
- Location: Planet Earth
As far as I can tell, at minimum the Debian-based distros seem to keep up to date with versions in each release. I haven't had a look at non-Debian-based distros in a while, so I can't speak for them.
Such a PPA, however, would be useful to people running older versions of the distros that don't have the most up-to-date version in their repository.
Such a PPA, however, would be useful to people running older versions of the distros that don't have the most up-to-date version in their repository.
That SilverNexus guy? You needn't worry about him.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.
He is level negative 4 in oratory, and his singing is worse.