cfc & gcfc 1.7.0 were compiling on my linux box, but not the SDL client.
I've read somewhere that someone in cfc 1.7.1 have fixed it.
now, I can't get the gcfclient1.7.1, even after a SDL-1.2.8 install, without a --disable-sdl when configuring.
so, for those who can see the sdlclient, does SDL really add a better view or a better gameplay, or can i forget to spend time with ?
cfc 1.7.1 : gcc: could not find SDL_image
Moderator: Board moderators
configure don't seem to fail, it's when making that gcc says
and only builds cfclient. with --disable-sdl, gcfclient is build too.
note : SDL-1.2.8 is installed with headers files, but SDL_image.h doesn't exists
Code: Select all
**X11: could not find SDL_image.h
exit(1) (where ** is g or cf or gcf)
note : SDL-1.2.8 is installed with headers files, but SDL_image.h doesn't exists
i've installed all the sdl packages (needed alien 'cause sdl-dev is only in .rpm on libsdl...
), then rebuild all with the new sdl-1.2.8 on a knoppix to hd
but it's not the main question :
does the use of sdl really improve the client ?
if so, i'll try to fix it, but don't want to do it for when i can get a 3200*2400 screen or to discover i need a 3000+ghz.

but it's not the main question :
does the use of sdl really improve the client ?
if so, i'll try to fix it, but don't want to do it for when i can get a 3200*2400 screen or to discover i need a 3000+ghz.
ok, fixed.
just enter in your cf client directory, before make depends
all the needed functions seems to be in the SDL.h includes.
and the only difference i see is the gray color of out of sight areas.
just enter in your cf client directory, before make depends
Code: Select all
$ touch SDL_image.h
and the only difference i see is the gray color of out of sight areas.