Can your svn updating be more verbose?
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 3:16 am
It rather bugs me that, when updating my version of Crossfire through the subversion repository, I get absolutely no information back as to what is being changed.
I also had a subversion trunk version of FreeDroidRPG (had, since FreeDroidRPG switched away from svn to use git), and, when I updated that, it told me what it was doing (adding, removing, changing), and to what file the alteration was made.
I think it would be nice if Crossfire at least said something when the version is updated through subversion. I remember thinking several times when updating Crossfire that nothing had happened, since it only said what revision it was updated to, which is what the FreeDroidRPG svn did when all files were up to date.
I'm not an expert on subversion, so I have no clue how much work it would take to do something like this. I just know it either can or could, since so many programs seem to tend to stray away from verbose information, be done, and thought I'd let my thoughts on it be heard.
I also had a subversion trunk version of FreeDroidRPG (had, since FreeDroidRPG switched away from svn to use git), and, when I updated that, it told me what it was doing (adding, removing, changing), and to what file the alteration was made.
I think it would be nice if Crossfire at least said something when the version is updated through subversion. I remember thinking several times when updating Crossfire that nothing had happened, since it only said what revision it was updated to, which is what the FreeDroidRPG svn did when all files were up to date.
I'm not an expert on subversion, so I have no clue how much work it would take to do something like this. I just know it either can or could, since so many programs seem to tend to stray away from verbose information, be done, and thought I'd let my thoughts on it be heard.